Skip to main content
Loading…
This section is included in your selections.

(1) If the person in charge fails to submit and implement a CNAP as required, or the approved CNAP does not result in the abatement of the chronic nuisance activity, the City Manager may refer the matter to the City Attorney to commence legal proceedings to seek closure of the property, the imposition of civil penalties, and any such other relief deemed appropriate. The action shall be brought in any court of competent jurisdiction, including the City of Medford Municipal Court. The court may award attorney fees to the prevailing party.

(2) The action shall be commenced by the filing of a complaint alleging facts constituting the nuisance activities, and containing a legal description of the property involved and an allegation that the owners of record of the property have been notified of the facts giving rise to the alleged nuisance activities at least ten (10) days prior to the filing of the action with the court.

(3) The complaint shall be served as provided in Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure (ORCP) 7. No service need be made prior to an application for a temporary restraining order, provided the procedures of ORCP 79 B are followed with regard to all persons entitled to service under this section.

(4) If after the commencement but prior to the trial of any action or suit brought by the City, a person in charge stipulates with the City that he or she will pursue a course of action the parties agree will abate the nuisance activities giving rise to the violation, the City may agree to stay proceedings for a period of not less than ten (10) days nor more than sixty (60) days. The person in charge or the City may thereafter petition the court for such additional periods of time as may be necessary to complete the action(s) to abate the nuisance activities. However, in the event that the City reasonably believes the person in charge of a property is not diligently pursuing the action(s) necessary to abate the nuisance activities, the City may apply to the court for release from the stay and may seek such relief as is deemed appropriate.

(5) When a person in charge responds to the Medford Police Department as required by this ordinance, statements made in connection with that response shall not constitute an admission of any chronic nuisance activities. This subsection does not require the exclusion of any evidence that is otherwise admissible or offered for any other purpose.

(6) If the existence of the nuisance is established in the action, an order of abatement shall be entered as part of the judgment in the case. The order may contain any or all of the following remedies:

(a) Order that the property be closed and secured against all access, use, and occupancy for a period of not less than six (6) months, nor more than one (1) year. The court shall retain jurisdiction during any period of closure. The person in charge may petition the court for an order reducing the period of closure if the person in charge and the City stipulate that the nuisance has been and will continue to be abated. The court shall not include provisions for the closing of the premises under the provisions of this subsection unless that relief is specifically requested in the complaint.

(b) Impose a civil penalty of up to $250 per day for each day nuisance activities occurred on the property following notice;

(c) any other relief prayed for and deemed appropriate.

(7) A property shall no longer be determined to be a chronic nuisance property either after the passage of one year from the date of the last reported chronic nuisance activity or the date the chronic nuisance abatement plan was approved, whichever is later.

(8) The provisions of section 7.960 through 7.978 are separate and distinct remedies from those specified in Medford Code sections 5.520 through 5.535. Nothing in these provisions shall require any conviction for criminal activities prior to the commencement of any action provided herein.

[Added Sec. 14, Ord. No. 2017-42, May 4, 2017.]